Choose job-related criteria
Prioritize essential skills, demonstrated results, availability and other legitimate role needs.
A structured approach to comparing relevant experience and potential without turning the process into unnecessary administration.
Decide what matters before candidate profiles are reviewed.
Prioritize essential skills, demonstrated results, availability and other legitimate role needs.
Use the same questions or work-sample criteria for candidates at the same stage.
Record concise, role-related reasons for advancing or declining candidates.
The process should be consistent and proportionate to the role.
Replace subjective impressions with observable behaviors related to the role.
Do not request sensitive personal details that are irrelevant to the hiring decision.
Avoid changing the standard after viewing individual applicants.
Keep assignments reasonable in scope and communicate expectations upfront.
Shortlisting works best when every candidate is assessed against the same meaningful requirements and when the process respects their time.
Create a scoring sheet before reviewing candidates. Use a small set of job-related criteria, document acceptable evidence for each and avoid giving unstructured “gut feeling” votes disproportionate weight.
For example, rate essential certification, relevant project evidence, communication requirements and availability separately. Do not infer ability from a candidate’s name, photo, age or unrelated personal information.
Keep in mind: Shortlisting is a decision aid, not a guarantee of performance. Revisit criteria if they exclude qualified candidates unnecessarily.
Get in touch about career content, hiring perspectives, partnerships or advertising opportunities.